In case you didn't know, the National Baseball Hall of Fame is a joke. It is a sham. A misnomer. A decorated soldier in Bud Selig's army deployed in the bogus Operation Baseball is Ethical strike on America.
No one was elected to the Hall on Wednesday in the annual vote of players eligible for consideration, in large part because many of the candidates come from the Steroid Era — a roughly 15 to 20-year period starting in the late 1980s when players started using performance enhancing drugs to boost stats.
The pervasive and completely flawed logic is that because a massive majority of these players used synthetics along on the way, they are blacklisted as cheaters and barred from entry into the Cooperstown baseball shrine.
Members of the Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA) make up the electorate in the Hall of Fame selection. It takes a 'Yes' vote from 75 percent of the writers to earn selection to the Hall. Wednesday's vote, in which indisputable all-time greats like Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Curt Schilling, Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro (all accused steroid users) didn't even come close to 75 percent, simply shows how readily the members of the BWAA eat up the company line like their paychecks depend on it.
Let me explain: Bud Selig, commissioner of baseball, has led the crusade against steroids in his sport for about a decade, more or less since Bonds broke the single-season home run record in 2001. He has encouraged everything from federal trials to congressional witch hunts in his public battle with steroids. And the world has eaten it up, as evidenced by Wednesday's Hall of Fame voting results.
But this only began when it became convenient for Selig. For a solid decade, if not 15 years before Bonds hit 73, steroid use grew exponentially among Major League players, with full cognizance of training staffs, front offices and league executives. In that time, it was technically against the rules, but enforcement was scarce, some say nonexistent.
Then in 1994, the baseball strike threatened to kill off the sport as a profession entirely in America. Fans stopped buying tickets. TV viewers flocked to anything but baseball. The sport needed a shot in the arm (or the butt) like never before and it got that jolt in the form of Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire.
Thanks to steroids, McGwire and Sosa saved baseball. In 1998 they hit 70 and 66 home runs, respectively, both shattering the previous record of 61 held for decades by Roger Maris, turning America's attention back to its pastime. If it wasn't Clinton and Lewinsky headlining the news, it was Sosa and McGwire. That's how big of a deal it was. And it was no secret to anyone on the inside where these guys' massive biceps, inflated bat speed and jacked up power came from. But did Selig nail them as villains for injecting their way to the top? Of course not. He had a failing business to run.
In fact, he did quite the opposite. He made sure Sosa and McGwire were exalted as gods of the sport. Major League Baseball started using the slogan "Chicks dig the long ball," making millions in merchandise emblazoned with that war cry. Not only does the catchphrase champion steroid use, it suggests that guys need 28-inch biceps because, of course, that's what "chicks dig."
Fast forward to 2013 and there is no greater enemy in professional sports than steroids. Likely, that's the position that should have been taken all along. It would have promoted health and morality in sports. But morality is not reality, not in baseball, despite what Selig would like everyone to think.
The BWAA members helping cleanse the Hall of steroid users are only buying into Selig's propaganda aiming to erase the last 20 years of baseball from the history books. It's called the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Morals. Bad history is just as important as good history. Every player can't be poster boy Cal Ripken with shiny blues and a perfect crescent smile.
The Hall should be a historical museum of all things important in baseball, and how can that exclude the men who helped save the sport 15 years ago?
I propose this: Let's start an Unbiased National Baseball Hall of Fame, where we don't pretend that history didn't happen just because we're not proud of it. The Black Sox will be included along with Bonds, Clemens and the rest of the Steroid Era greats. Pete Rose has been known to throw his money around. Maybe he'll help fund it. We can let him in, too.
What do you think? Should steroid users be allowed in the Hall of Fame? Tell us in the comments!
Your purist way of thinking is flawed. Well over half of baseball players were juicing during this period. Remember Brady Anderson? Bonds was hanging gaudy numbers against juicers. The pitchers juiced, the fielders juiced, and the hitters juiced. Yet he still dominated. Baseball clearly didn't care because it did not have any rules in place to deter juicing.how can you make new rules, and then go back intime and demonize people who were not breaking any rules at the time? Bonds hung up crazy numbers in Pittsburgh when he was below 200lbs. He continued that same level of play in Frisco-Disco. He is one of the top 5 players of all time. If he's not in the HOF, then there should be not HOF.
The differences between the two forms of cheating, I think, are much more subtle in outcome. How are supposed to measure that a few spitballs here and there were somehow less advantageous that steroids? Whether a player was a roider or a spitballer, he still cheated, he still gained an advantage (as best we know), and he still didn't get caught. Does it matter how much it helped him? I think the point of the article is to suggest that the HOF is broken. Its qualifications for entry have become so murky, that maybe it should just be redefined.
Whether Barry Bonds, Clemens et al, were was snubbed by Hall voters is an indication of just how emotional these arguments are, and also an indication that the baseball HOF probably needs to more succinctly define it's criteria to its voting members.. But it's not a bigger problem than the use of the drugs. The drugs are the problem. Its over-simplistic to suggest that the players use drugs because the money at stake is so significant, but I believe that the money has a lot to do with the root of the drug problem in baseball. That said, does anyone remember the Bonds vs Eric Gagne at bat at AT&T Park in 2004 when Bonds hit a 101 MPH juiced fastball about 450 ft? Now that was entertaining! Juicer vs Juicer! So then, is this all in the name of entertainment, and should the drugs simply be overlooked?
Stamford - As I recall, part of my post was that I was not saying that he didn't do PEDs. It's a little like the OJ trial where a lot of people thought they knew he did it, but he was deemed not guilty.
NFL has a huge problem with head trauma. And there is a number of class action suits involving ex-players regarding this issue. The liability ramifications are massive. Plus will the next generation of kids be held back from playing... because the more parents find out about the risks. The NFL is even weaker on testing and enforcement of PED's than the MLB.
1) The Dodgers suck. 2) I'm not understanding your argument. The white players that played before integration didn't cheat. If they conspired to keep black players out of the league, then maybe there would be a parallel. But they didn't have much of a say in the matter. They went out and played the game against the competition that was on the field. And they did it without fattening their stats with steroids.